Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
(HC) Meza v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv02748
Petitioner:
Joaquin Meza
Respondent:
R. St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Meza v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01736
Petitioner:
Mariano Meza
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Meza v. St. Andre
as 5:2023cv03912
Petitioner:
Joaquin Meza
Respondent:
R. St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Rojo v. Amador Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02137
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Meza Rojo
Defendant:
Amador Jail, Martin and Jeremy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reyes v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Reuben Joseph Reyes
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Howard E. Moseley, Ron Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chacon v. Antonio et al
as 3:2022cv01683
Petitioner:
Miguel Alberto Legaspy Chacon
Respondent:
S. Antonio and Meza-Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. McCourt et al
as 3:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Kyle Avery
Defendant:
Dan McCourt, H. Chaudhry, S. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Connie Gipson, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
