Cases 1 - 10 of 52
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anguiano v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Anguiano, Jr.
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Gann v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 22-16862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATEWIDE RELIGIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, J. KNIGHT, Appeals Examiner at the Office of Appeals (CDCR) and others
Mario Anguiano Betancourt v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2022cv02811
Petitioner:
Mario Anguiano Betancourt
Respondent:
Warden Glen E. Pratt and Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Betancourt v. Pratt
as 2:2022cv02815
Petitioner:
Mario Anguiano Betancourt
Respondent:
Warden Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar v. Arnold et al
as 3:2020cv07235
Defendant:
E. Sanders, Dan Bloomfield, S. Arana and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rodriguez v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv01373
Defendant:
Fisher, B. Rodriguez, Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alberto Anguiano v. Patricia Bradley et al
as 2:2020cv07615
Petitioner:
Alberto Anguiano
Respondent:
United States of America and Patricia Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alberto Anguiano v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv07080
Petitioner:
Alberto Anguiano
Respondent:
United States of America and Patricia Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
