Cases 1 - 10 of 6,955
(PC) Arguilez v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
Dorel Arguilez
Defendant:
D. Cuevas, Ionic, G. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cardi B et al
as 2:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor and New Muslim Party (N.I.U.A.)
Defendant:
Cardi B and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Luna v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01686
Petitioner:
Benito Julian Luna
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Gallegos v. Ebert et al
as 2:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
B. Ebert, E. Ngaya, Anthony F. Inconelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Defendant:
S. Steadman, P. Wingo, B. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Castrellon v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
Michael Castrellon
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, M. Tsvetkov, B. Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael R. Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv04759
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler, Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR, Does 1-10, Officers of B Yard Building 1, Does 1-10, Medical Administration and Doctor of Control of B Yard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shavers v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv03272
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Shavers, Jr
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
