Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Raymond Bradford v. G. Church, et al
as 23-15293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
G. CHURCH, CARSON, B. BYRANT and others
Lafonzo Turner v. S. Byer
as 22-16573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BYER, Sgt. Individual Capacity
Lafonzo Turner v. S. Byer
as 22-16553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BYER, Sgt. Individual Capacity
Robert Byers v. Matthew Vester, et al
as 22-35676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JEROME BYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW VESTER, LEZLEE CURTIS, Two Rivers Food Service Coordinators and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Byers v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Cpl. Bolson, Sgt. R. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafonzo Turner v. S. Byer
as 22-15911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BYER, Sgt. Individual Capacity
Davidoff v. Matteucci et al
as 6:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Dianne Davidoff
Defendant:
Dolores Matteucci, Lindsey Sande, Monica Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeder v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Dustin Paul Reeder
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David K Byers and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman Gaines v. E. Horowitz, et al
as 22-15263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THURMAN GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
E. HOROWITZ, Dr.; MCSP
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. D. ZAMORA, Chief Exec., T. BYERS, SATF-Cor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
