Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Grandinetti v. Lee-Zidek et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeffrey Mane, Muriel Ah Cheong, SHU ACO's and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. HCF Visitation Room Officers and Staff et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
HCF Visitation Room Officers and Staff, Public Defender, ACO Dante and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Eleby v. Beard et al
as 2:2018cv02032
Defendant:
C.M. Heck, M. Contreas, J. Beard and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Eleby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slaughter v. White et al
as 2:2016cv01067
Plaintiff:
Ossie Lee Slaughter
Defendant:
Dan White, Jack Warner, Timothy C Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel Diaz v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 14-16986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, Warden, J. REYNOSSO, Associate Warden, R. GARCIA, CC II and others
Mitchell v. Beard et al
as 1:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
J. Beard, Sherman, J.D. Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elbert Vaught, IV v. G. Ugwueze, et al
as 13-15055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
G. UGWUEZE, M.D., N. WARREN, Chief, J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver and others
Morris v. Green
as 2:2012cv02448
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
C.M. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Vasquez, et al.
as 1:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Miguel Enrique Diaz
Defendant:
Vasquez, R Morales, J. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kawamoto v. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 1:2011cv01308
Plaintiff:
Darren Kawamoto
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Director of CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
