Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Douglas Keith Casey v. Wayne Reaud et al
as 2:2023cv09194
Plaintiff:
Douglas Keith Casey
Defendant:
Wayne Reaud, CIA, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heizelman v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Robert Heizelman
Defendant:
Biden, FBI, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Giffen v. CIA / DOD / Others
as 6:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Respondent:
CIA / DOD / Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gregory Van Huisen v. Charles Brown, et al
as 23-55077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES BROWN, Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, BILL J. BURNS, CIA Director, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President and others
Willis v. Gate a CIA
as 3:2022cv01584
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Gate a CIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. CIA/USSS -gate et al
as 3:2022cv01599
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
CIA/USSS -gate, FBI -gate, Meso - gate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Junior Tejeda v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2022cv01568
Plaintiff:
Junior Tejeda
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency and Unknown CIA Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rollings v. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, F.C.I Terminal Island, Western District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ronald Rollings v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, FCI Terminal Island, Western District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Banks v. The CIA et al
as 2:2020cv10769
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, LA Warden, The CIA and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
