Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cornish v. Multnomah County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Sacirovic, Tiffany, Valdovinos and others
Plaintiff:
Ammiel Z. Cornish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Moimoi, Ernesto Romero, Jonathan Armand Harris and others
Defendant:
Multnomah County Circuit Court, State of Oregon, Multnomah County Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv05544
Defendant:
Roy Gonzales, Ron Haynes, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis B Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Christopher Podratz, Godwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karkunov v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv05231
Plaintiff:
Albert Karkunov
Defendant:
Julieann C Smith, Lisa J. Oliver-Estes, Shari Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Obenland et al
as 3:2014cv06010
Plaintiff:
Jamal James Ellis
Defendant:
Mike Obenland, Maybre, Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troupe v. Cornish et al
as 3:2014cv05733
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
Tracy L Cornish and Kenneth E McKenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean Alan Cornish v. P.D. Brazelton
as 5:2013cv01302
Respondent:
P D Brazelton
Petitioner:
Bean Alan Cornish
Brown v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05367
Plaintiff:
Eldorado Brown
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Susan Lucas, Michael Obenland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
Eldorado Brown
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Susan Lucas, Michael Obenland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
