Cases 1 - 10 of 103
(PC) Felix v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Felix
Defendant:
State of California, Stephanie Clandenin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01835
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01765
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leslie v. Ofcer. Bowen et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Emerson Leslie
Defendant:
Ofcer. Bowen and Jennifer Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Felix v. Clandenin et al
as 1:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Felix
Defendant:
Stephanie Clandenin, Brandon Price and A. Imparato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Felix v. Clandenin et al
as 1:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson Felix
Defendant:
Stephanie Clandenin, Brandon Price and Joel Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Grasley et al
as 3:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Barnes Grasley and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jose Emerson Rodriguez Gonzalez v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2022cv09202
Petitioner:
Jose Emerson Rodriguez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christopher Washington v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-16815
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, PATRICK COVELLO, T. MEZA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
