Cases 1 - 10 of 41
(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Oscar Romero Diaz
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pleasant Valley State Prison, PVSP Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerry Dewayne Williams v. Sergeant McNeal et al
as 2:2023cv07292
Plaintiff:
Gerry Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Sergeant McNeal, Camacho, A. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis-Murray v. State of California, et al
as 3:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Blake Davis-Murray
Defendant:
State of California, Hercules Police Department, Pinole Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Florez v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00307
Petitioner:
Dagoberto Lopez Florez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Myers v. Clayton et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dean Myers
Defendant:
David Clayton, E. Brillo, R. Buckel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Nocha et al
as 2:2021cv02330
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
A. Nocha, H. Florez and E. Magallanes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Blackman v. Gomez et al
as 3:2021cv00923
Defendant:
K. Tebrock, R. Rosiles, R. Florez and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Blackman v. Gomez et al
as 2:2021cv00821
Defendant:
E. Velasco, J. Vasquez, R. Rosiles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harper v. Sherman et al
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
Richard Milam, Stu Sherman, M. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Sherman et al
as 2:2021at00337
Defendant:
Richard Milam, Stu Sherman, William Elszy and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
