Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Juan Pablo Castro v. Francisco J. Quintana
as 2:2023cv06273
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Castro
Respondent:
Warden Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cruz Arellano-Ortiz v.Warden Francisco J. Quintana
as 2:2023cv06290
Petitioner:
Cruz Arellano-Ortiz
Respondent:
Warden Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hector Adolfo Acevedo Alzate v. Francisco J. Quintana
as 5:2023cv01533
Petitioner:
Hector Adolfo Acevedo Alzate
Respondent:
Warden Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Antoine Aroche v. Francisco J. Quintana
as 5:2022cv01414
Petitioner:
Antoine Aroche
Respondent:
Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Antonio Mendoza v. Francisco J. Quintana
as 5:2019cv00106
Respondent:
Francisco J. Quintana
Petitioner:
Antonio Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard Powell v. Francisco J. Quintana
as 2:2018cv08838
Respondent:
Francisco J. Quintana
Petitioner:
Richard Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Milton v. Quintana
as 4:2018cv05008
Petitioner:
Kyle David Milton
Respondent:
Francisco J Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos D. Jackson v. Francisco J. Quintana
as 2:2017cv02640
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Jackson
Respondent:
Francisco J. Quintana
Christopher Jeburk v. Francisco Quintana
as 17-55215
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE JEBURK
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden, USP Victorville
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson, et al
as 17-55092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
L FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
