Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Isaiah Preston Gassaway v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Preston Gassaway
Defendant:
County of Orange, Unknown Deputy 1 and Unknown Deputy 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gassaway v. County of Orange et al
as 3:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Preston Gassaway
Defendant:
County of Orange, Unknown Deputy #1 and Unknown Deputy #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01799
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01494
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01476
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godoy v. Brown et al
as 4:2018cv06650
Defendant:
Briggs Karl, Dean Borders, E. Whitlock and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Edwin Chick, Donald Shomaker, Donald Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Rogers Jackson v. Matthew Cate et al
as 2:2009cv01326
Plaintiff:
Paul Rogers Jackson
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Robert Ayers, Jr, F. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hatfield et al
as 1:2007cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Williams
Defendant:
D.K. Hatfield, - Gassaway, C. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
