Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PC) Theodora Medley v. S. Pfitzer et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Theodore Medley
Defendant:
S. Pfitzer, Yashadora Rao, S. Aref and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodora Medley v. S. Pfitzer et al
as 5:2021cv00545
Defendant:
H. Drey, Kathleen Alison, Jane or John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Medley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remund v. Zamudio et al
as 3:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Eugene M. Remund
Defendant:
Fernando Zamudio, R. Holt and Jane and John Does I through X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crisp v. California Health Care Facility et al
as 2:2014cv01345
Plaintiff:
Obie Lee Crisp
Defendant:
California Health Care Facility, California Correctional Health Care Services, Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crisp v. California Health Care Facility et al
as 5:2014cv01762
Plaintiff:
Obie Lee Crisp
Defendant:
California Health Care Facility, California Correctional Health Care Services, Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassano v. Wlodarezy et al
as 3:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Gary Cassano
Defendant:
Robert Wlodarezy, M.D., John Schartz, M.D. and Jane and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Bush v. M Block et al
as 5:2013cv01795
Defendant:
Officer M Block, Officer M Block, Seargent Cokesh and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bush and Bush's Towing
Rodney B. Thomas v. BOP
as 5:2013cv00825
Defendant:
Arcola Washington Adduci, Arcola Washington Adduci, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney B Thomas
Wright v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2012cv02332
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane Wright
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe 1, Jane or John Doe 2 and Jane or John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canup v. Rink et al
as 3:2011cv02067
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Canup
Defendant:
Rink, Kenndy, Jane or John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
