Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mark James Lyon v. Gena Jones
as 2:2024cv02812
Petitioner: Mark James Lyon
Respondent: Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Highberger
as 6:2024cv00492
Petitioner: Mark James Wilson
Respondent: Joshua Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Randall v. VonRader et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02181
Plaintiff: Mark Randall and Mark James Randall
Defendant: H. VonRader, J. Robinette and T. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McShane v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff: Mark James McShane
Defendant: State of Oregon, Multnomah County District Attorney and Portland Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McShane v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01184
Plaintiff: Mark James McShane
Defendant: State of Oregon, Multnomah County District Attorney and Portland Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv00957
Plaintiff: Mark James Farmer
Defendant: State of Oregon, Oregon State Bar Association, Oregon Health Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark James Lyon v. R. Ndoh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01963
Taylor v. Wofford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00996
Petitioner: Mark James Taylor
Respondent: C. Wofford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark James Simon v. Jeff Macomber
as 2:2014cv03763
Respondent: Jeff Macomber
Petitioner: Mark James Simon
Denny v. USA
as 1:2014cv00069
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Mark James Denny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?