Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Joseph Michael Andrews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01521
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael Andrew Dennis v. Warden
as 2:2023cv04342
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Dennis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dennis v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Dennis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Jace v. Margaret Lirones, et al
as 23-15586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW JACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
Paris v. Pollard
as 3:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Paris
Defendant:
Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Jace v. Ronald Davis
as 22-55241
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW JACE
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Rose v. Two Rivers Correctional Institution
as 2:2021cv00654
Defendant:
Two Rivers Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
