Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Henry C. Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv09885
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry C. Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv09513
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farren Bryant v. Debbie Asuncion et al
as 2:2019cv06889
Defendant:
Correctional Officer H. Watson, Warden Debbie Asuncion, Sgt. R. Clemons and others
Plaintiff:
Farren Bryant, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv04107
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C Hayes and Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David James Pangborn v. Director of CDCR et al
as 2:2019cv02503
Plaintiff:
David James Pangborn
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Director of CDCR, K. Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oscar Machado v. J. Soto et al
as 2:2014cv09894
Defendant:
E. Cardenas, R. Clemons, R. Navarrette and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Machado
Guzman A Roddy v. Jeffrey Beard et al
as 2:2013cv06907
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Jeffrey Beard, Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Guzman A Roddy
Lonnie Perkins v. R. Crum, et al
as 11-16903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE DONELL PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. CRUM, Correctional Officer, R. CLEMONS, Correctional Officer, J. R. GARZA, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Perkins v. Crum et al
as 1:2010cv01115
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Donell Perkins
Defendant:
R. Crum, R. Clemons, J.R. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Chrones et al
as 4:2009cv05855
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Donell Perkins
Defendant:
L. Chrones, Robert Horel, Francisco Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
