Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Andrade v. Cantu
as 2:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Alencar Reis Andrade, Jr.
Defendant:
John E Cantu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrade v. Cantu
as 2:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Alencar Reis Andrade, Jr.
Defendant:
John E Cantu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrade v. Cantu
as 2:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Alencar Reis Andrade, Jr.
Defendant:
John E Cantu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moreno-Vasquez v. USA
as 4:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Rey David Moreno-Vasquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Anderson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Reentry and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Brian Lyle Anderson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Reentry and Rehabilitation, A Camacho, Unknown Rameriz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Roberto Antoine Darden and Roberto Darden
Defendant:
United States of America, Barbara Von Blanckensee, M Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stine v. Tubbs et al
as 4:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Unknown Tubbs, Unknown Rey, C Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Catricia Howard, Unknown Bass, Unknown Rey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Stangl et al
as 4:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Amanda Stangl, Catricia Howard, Garrett Merrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguirre v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00263
Petitioner:
Rey David Aguirre
Respondent:
David Shinn, Christopher Browning and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
