Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Renfro, III v. West Valley Detention Center, et al
as 23-55311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD RENFRO III
Defendant / Appellee:
WEST VALLEY DETENTION CENTER, RISK MANAGEMENT, official capacity, STAFF IN FISCAL DEPARTMENT, individual and official capacity and others
Donald Renfro, III v.Warden Shannon Dicus et al
as 5:2022cv01929
Petitioner:
Donald Renfro, III
Respondent:
Warden Shannon Dicus and Deputy Menoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Renfro, III v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00725
Petitioner:
Donald Renfro, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Renfro v. West Valley Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Donald Renfro, III
Defendant:
West Valley Detention Center, Classification Staff, Custody Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Marcus Renfroe v. Daniel Pramo
as 2:2016cv05528
Respondent:
Daniel Pramo
Petitioner:
Dale Marcus Renfroe
Renfro v. Clark-Barlow et al
as 2:2015cv00632
Plaintiff:
Ray Richard Renfro
Defendant:
Lisa Clark-Barlow, Christopher Smith and J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Renfro et al
as 1:2013cv01933
Plaintiff:
James D. Richards
Defendant:
Charles Renfro, Midori Howd, Fresno Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray Renfro v. Rosanne Campbell
as 10-15408
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAY RICHARD RENFRO
Respondent - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
