Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Fletcher v. Golightly et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
Mary Golightly, T Craw and Echos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlefield v. Splawn et al
as 1:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwin Littlefield
Defendant:
B Splawn, Lt T Irion, Lt E Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWhorter v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05146
Plaintiff:
John T McWhorter
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Indeterminate Sentence Review Board, Jeremy Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bones et al v H.I.G. Capital LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bones, T. G. and C. G.
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital, LLC., Wellpath, County of Clallam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gates v. Cole-Tindall
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Brandon T Gates
Respondent:
Patti Cole-Tindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marshall v. Maitland
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Tyler Leslie Marshall
Defendant:
T Maitland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lumpkin v. SCORE Jail et al
as 2:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr
Defendant:
SCORE Jail, M Gomez, T Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lotusflower v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower
Defendant:
Charlotte Headley, Alishia McColl, Boschulte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
