Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cooks v. Transportation Security Administration et al
as 4:2021cv00013
Defendant: Transportation Security Administration, Drug Emforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff: Willie Cooks
United States of America v. Approximately $2,034,520.55 in United States Currency Seized By Law Enforcement On or About August 17, 2020
as 3:2020cv07463
Defendant: Approximately $2,034,520.55 in United States Currency Seized By Law Enforcement On or About August 17, 2020
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Sidney T Kaufmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Approximately 15,602 Ether (ETH) and .16 Bitcoin (BTC) seized by law enforcement on or about December 14, 2017 et al
as 3:2020cv06482
Defendant: Approximately 15,602 Ether (ETH) and .16 Bitcoin (BTC) seized by law enforcement on or about December 14, 2017 and Approximately 199.71841508 BTC, $6,164,994.22 USD and 1199.00 NEO seized by law enforcement on or about August 23, 2019
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. 9mm machinegun manufactured by Parabellum Combat Systems/ Silver Bullet Gun Works, Model PCS-9, Serial No. 50799, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00496
Defendant: 9mm machinegun manufactured by Parabellum Combat Systems/ Silver Bullet Gun Works, Model PCS-9, Serial No. 50799, et al, 7.62 caliber machinegun manufactured by Jaco Sales Co. LLC, Model MAG58, Serial No. MAG1131, .223 caliber machinegun manufactured by Heckler & Koch/ Silver Bullet Gun Works, Model HK93, Serial No. 507 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55555
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55556
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56922
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AKA Seal A
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A
Tran v. Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd et al
as 5:2012cv03333
Plaintiff: Danh M Tran
Defendant: Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd, Win Law Group, P.C. and Brian N. Winn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. $17,927.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2011cv01270
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $17,927.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Richard M. Barnett, A Professional Law Corporation
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Eric Honig, et al
as 10-56467
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK
Intervenor - Appellee: LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property located at, AKA Seal A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?