Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Approximately 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange account associated with user id 3
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange account associated with user id 3 and Approx 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange acct associated with user id 395972026
Interested Party: Advocus National Title Insurance Company doing business as Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Xue Ji v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv05683
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General and others
Plaintiff: Xue Ji
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Approximately $106,335.00 in the DLA Piper Attorney-Client Trust Bank Account
as 2:2017at00652
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $106,335.00 in the DLA Piper Attorney-Client Trust Bank Account
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $106,335.00 in the DLA Piper Attorney-Client Trust Bank Account We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01300
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $106,335.00 in the DLA Piper Attorney-Client Trust Bank Account
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017mc00014
Movant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States Attorney's Ofice v. Ely Radio, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00405
Defendant: Ely Radio, LLC
Plaintiff: United States Attorney's Ofice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Funds in the Approximate Amount of $253,525.35 et al
as 1:2012cv00541
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Funds in the Approximate Amount of $253,525.35 , $25,000.00 held in attorney trust account , 2006 Honda Odyssey, VIN No. 5FNRL38796B027788 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS550, VIN: WDDDJ7CB3AA165644, License Number 6SYA458 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01631
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS550, VIN: WDDDJ7CB3AA165644, License Number 6SYA458, Approximately $121,872 seized from the Attorney-Client Trust Fund Account at Wells Fargo Bank and $1,931,118.00 Interest in the $2,437,500.00 Promissory Note secured by real property located on Placer Corporate Drive, Rocklin, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS550, VIN: WDDDJ7CB3AA165644, License Number 6SYA458 et al
as 2:2012at00856
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS550, VIN: WDDDJ7CB3AA165644, License Number 6SYA458, Approximately $121,872 seized from the Attorney-Client Trust Fund Account at Wells Fargo Bank and $1,931,118.00 Interest in the $2,437,500.00 Promissory Note secured by real property located on Placer Corporate Drive, Rocklin, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hopper v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00503
Defendant: Department Of Justice, District of Nevada, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern Division and others
Plaintiff: Royal M. Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?