Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Camille Armstead et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05675
Plaintiff:
Camille Armstead, Gerry Chamberlain, Terence Klafke and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Martin et al v. Drumlummon Gold
as 2:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Cy Martin and Erik Larsen
Defendant:
Drumlummon Gold
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edward Machoskie v. Bank of America National Association et al
as 8:2012cv01024
Defendant:
Heidi Alimoto, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America National Association and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Machoskie
Steven Larsen v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2011cv04363
Defendant:
Airtran Airways, Inc. Employee Welfare Benefit Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Steven Larsen
Ott et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc
as 2:2010cv01388
Plaintiff:
Jason Ott, Bill Mauhl, Darci Hall and others
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc doing business as Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Washington, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. Health & Welfare Plan for Non-Flex Participants and John and Jane Does No. 1-10, in Their Capacity as Current Trustees of the Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. Health & Welfare Plan for Non-Flex Participants
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ott et al v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01387
Defendant:
Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Ott, Bill Mauhl, Mike Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Keim v. Larsen
as 3:2009cv00845
Plaintiff:
Shauna Keim
Defendant:
Robert Larsen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez-Beltran et al v. Doug Larsen Construction, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00692
Plaintiff:
Felipe Rodriguez-Beltran, Felipe Rodriguez-Beltran, Cesar Contreras and others
Defendant:
Doug Larsen Construction, Inc. and Jose Maciel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
