Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Morris et al v. National Football League et al
as 3:2012cv02077
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Morris , Ross W. Fichtner , Karen Fichtner and others
Defendant:
National Football League , NFL Properties LLC , Riddell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Isaac Curry v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al
as 2:2012cv06962
Plaintiff:
Isaac Curry
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank N A
Art Monk et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv04759
Plaintiff:
Chidi Ahanatu, Steve Baack, Elmer F. Bailey and others
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Andersen et al v. DHL Retirement Pension Plan et al
as 2:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Randal Andersen , Quin Arnold , Colbert Arter and others
Defendant:
DHL Retirement Pension Plan, DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. and DHL Pension Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Curry v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 2:2011cv02048
Plaintiff:
Rita Curry
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada , Carpe Diem Collegiate High School and Carpe Diem Collegiate High School Employee Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Curry v. Natividad Medical Center County of Monterey
as 5:2011cv04662
Plaintiff:
Richard Curry
Defendant:
Natividad Medical Center County of Monterey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Waldemar Kubicki v. Curry Computer Technology, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01320
Defendant:
Michael Curry, Curry Computer Technology, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Kubicki
Currie-White v. Blockbuster, Inc.
as 3:2009cv02593
Plaintiff:
Melissa S. Currie-White, Melissa S. Currie-White, Melissa S. Currie-White and others
Defendant:
Blockbuster, Inc., Blockbuster, Inc. and Blockbuster, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Curry v. MPC Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Cathy Marston Curry
Defendant:
MPC Corporation, MPC Computers, LLC, MPC-PRO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
