Cases 21 - 30 of 1,225
Golden v. Haskins Electric LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Cole Golden
Defendant:
Haskins Electric LLC, Charles B Haskins, Katrina Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Williams Plant Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Williams Plant Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Alliance Glass Company LLC
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Alliance Glass Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. De Figueiredo et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, Robert Williams and others
Defendant:
Steven Arthur De Figueiredo and DE FIG FLOORING, INC. a California Corporation doing business as SD Flooring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. All Bay Area Glass
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
All Bay Area Glass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation et al
as 2:2023cv10858
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Defendant:
Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation, Corey William Stiles and Stiles Consulting Firm LLC doing business as Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Bay Area Tintworks, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06614
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Robert Williams, John Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Bay Area Tintworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. FieldTurf USA, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06472
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, Robert Williams and others
Defendant:
FieldTurf USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Williams et al v. Pathion Holdings, Inc et al
as 5:2023cv06229
Plaintiff:
Brandie Williams, Derek Clayton and Jacqueline Leach
Defendant:
Pathion Holdings, Inc, Pathion, Inc. and Michael Liddle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
William Rubin v. Evans Adhesive Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv10098
Plaintiff:
William Rubin
Defendant:
Evans Adhesive Corporation and Does 1 through 35, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
