Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Ebner v. The Neil Jones Food Company
as 1:2014at00774
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ebner
Defendant:
The Neil Jones Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tourville v. The Neil Jones Food Company
as 1:2014cv01195
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tourville
Defendant:
The Neil Jones Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tourville v. The Neil Jones Food Company
as 1:2014at00557
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tourville
Defendant:
The Neil Jones Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neil v. National Football League et al
as 3:2014cv01357
Plaintiff:
Ken Neil
Defendant:
National Football League , NFL Properties LLC , Riddell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Rose v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A. Incorporated
as 2:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Neil Rose
Defendant:
Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A. Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
O'Neil v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2013cv01456
Plaintiff:
Marie O'Neil
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and BDO Seidman, LLP Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Osric Brown et al v. Prospect Mortgage LLC
as 2:2013cv02850
Plaintiff:
Osric Brown, Neil Davenport, Phil Duncan and others
Defendant:
Prospect Mortgage LLC
Woerner et al v. Saxton et al
as 1:2013cv00395
Defendant:
Jeld-Wen Employee Stock Ownership & Retirement Plan, Ronald Saxton, R. Neil Stuart and others
Plaintiff:
Mildred Powell and Christopher W Woerner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Woerner et al v. Saxton et al
as 3:2013cv00395
Defendant:
Jeld-Wen Employee Stock Ownership & Retirement Plan, Ronald Saxton, R. Neil Stuart and others
Plaintiff:
Mildred Powell and Christopher W Woerner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Neil Lynch, et al v. North Slope Borough
as 13-35094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEIL LYNCH
Plaintiff:
JOHN DATTA and BENJAMIN HUNSAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
