Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Perez v. Comex Food Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01821
Defendant:
Andrew Truong, Jan Nguyen, K.C. of Rowland Heights and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Rowland v. Big E's Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03915
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rowland
Defendant:
Big E's Incorporated, Ernest D Guzman and Dianna T Guzman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Russell et al v. Swick Mining Services USA Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00924
Plaintiff:
Wendell Russell , Michael Oelke , Randy McGrath and others
Defendant:
Swick Mining Services USA Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rowland v. Richland Research Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv04493
Plaintiff:
Meshelle Rowland
Defendant:
Richland Research Corporation, Valarie Smilovic, Gabe Young and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Rowland v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02135
Plaintiff:
James Rowland
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC and Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v. Swick Mining Services USA Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02887
Plaintiff:
Wendell Russell , Michael Oelke , Randy McGrath and others
Defendant:
Swick Mining Services USA Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lisa Rowland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv04548
Defendant:
Does and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rowland
Rowland v. Continental Assurance Company et al
as 3:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
Sandra Rowland
Defendant:
Continental Assurance Company and CNA Financial Corporation Ltd Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lisa Rowland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 09-56467
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LISA ROWLAND, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
