Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Candis Williams-Moore v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Candis Williams-Moore
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Candie Frazier v. ByteDance Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09913
Plaintiff:
Candie Frazier
Defendant:
TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noemi Russo v. Joamar, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03939
Defendant:
Saul Perez, Doe Managers 1-3, Does 4-10, inclusive, and others
Plaintiff:
Noemi Russo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Candy Houle v. Billy P. Cannon et al
as 5:2019cv01003
Defendant:
Billy P. Cannon, Jr.
Plaintiff:
CANDY HOULE and Mark Houle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Ping v. See's Candy Shops, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02504
Defendant:
See's Candies, Inc. and See's Candy Shops, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laci Ping
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Osuegbu v. AMN Healthcare, Inc., et al
as 3:2016cv02816
Plaintiff:
Osuegbu, Robert Shaw, Lorenzo Holmes and others
Defendant:
AMN Healthcare, Inc, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Inc., AMN Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dela Vega v. See's Candies, Inc.
as 3:2014cv04449
Defendant:
See's Candies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Dela Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gustavo Torres v. Town and Country Cafe et al
as 8:2014cv00118
Defendant:
Candy Lee and Town and Country Cafe
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Torres
Carrasco v. Dell Services Federal Government, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02564
Plaintiff:
Candy Carrasco
Defendant:
Dell Services Federal Government, Inc. and Does 1 to 30, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maninang v. Randstad Employment Solutions, LP et al
as 3:2010cv01402
Plaintiff:
Candis Maninang
Defendant:
Randstad Employment Solutions, LP , Randstad Creative Talent, LP , Randstad General Partner (US), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
