Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 2,892
(HC) Jones v. Cates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00839
Petitioner: Stepfon Jones
Respondent: B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack v. Cates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03925
Plaintiff: Rodney Jerome Womack
Defendant: B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Larson v. Aln et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff: Harvey Eugene Larson
Defendant: V. Aln, Miller, Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Cates
as 22-1119
Petitioner: WALTER LEE COLE
Respondent: BRIAN CATES and RON BROOMFIELD
Stepfon Jones v. B. Cates
as 2:2022cv04399
Petitioner: Stepfon Jones
Defendant: B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nathan Rivera v. Brian Cates
as 22-55602
Petitioner / Appellant: NATHAN RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee: BRIAN CATES, Warden
Vanloan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff: Jonathan Vanloan
Defendant: The Nation of Islam, Louis Farrafhan, Tony Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Womack v. Cates
as 22-884
Petitioner: RODNEY JEROME WOMACK
Respondent: BRIAN CATES, ACTING WARDEN
Raymond Hennings v. Brian Cates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55484
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMOND MICHAEL HENNINGS
Respondent / Appellee: BRIAN CATES, Warden
(HC)Lawless v. Cates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00523
Petitioner: Kristopher William Lawless
Respondent: Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?