Cases 91 - 100 of 472
Jack Hummer v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK HUBERT HUMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, ADOC, JAMES BAIRD, Dr. and DENNIS G. CHENAIL
Wilkinson v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
Scott Wilkinson
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Bennie H Rollins, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Schackart v. Dora Schriro
as 09-99009
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD SCHACKART
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO
Eugene Cofsky v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16189
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE J. COFSKY
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Daniel Aguilar v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16118
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL AGUILAR
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and TERRY GODDARD
Terrell Dansby v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16107
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRELL D. DANSBY
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Robert Cox v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16026
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT COX
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Willaims v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dain Willaims
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Bennie Rollins, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lemke v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv01059
Petitioner:
Robert D Lemke
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott Nordstrom v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15995
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT D. NORDSTROM
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director of Arizona Dept. of Corrections, C. TOERSBIJNS, Deputy Warden Eyman Complex and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
