Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 112
Armstrong v. Tescher et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff: Muiria Armstrong
Defendant: Jolyne Tescher, Rhonda Belgarde, Carolyn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knudsen v. Kirkegard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00036
Petitioner: Johnny Lee Knudsen
Respondent: Leroy Kirkegard , Tim Fox and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darrell Sharp v. State of Montana, et al
as 14-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL DEAN SHARP
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF MONTANA, MERLE RAPH, LAURIE MCKINNON and others
Monforton v. Motl et al
as 6:2014cv00002
Plaintiff: Matthew Monforton
Defendant: Jonathan Motl , Tim Fox , Leo Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. State of Montana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00088
Plaintiff: Darrell Dean Sharp
Defendant: State of Montana, Merle Raph, Laurie McKinnon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Fox We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00089
Petitioner: Darrell Dean Sharp
Respondent: Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeRosier v. Kirkegard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2013cv00215
Petitioner: Louis DeRosier
Respondent: Leroy Kirkegard and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeRosier v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2013cv00061
Petitioner: Louis DeRosier
Respondent: Leroy Kirkegard and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Doyle v. Martin Frink, et al
as 13-35933
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH DOYLE
Respondent - Appellee: MARTIN FRINK and TIM FOX
James Martin v. Martin Frink, et al
as 13-35926
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES GENE MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee: MARTIN FRINK, TIM FOX and STATE OF MONTANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?