Cases 121 - 130 of 140
Michele Medrano, et al v. Autozone, Inc.
as 09-17503
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA MORENO, individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELE MEDRANO, individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation
William Doland et al v. Autozone Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01138
Plaintiff:
William Doland, William Doland, William Doland and others
Defendant:
Autozone Inc, Autozone Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bruce Paul Maynard v. Autozone Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07209
Plaintiff:
Bruce Paul Maynard and Bruce Paul Maynard
Defendant:
Autozone Inc., Autozone Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-17149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16860
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Autozone, Inc. v. Michael Migi
as 09-80121
Petitioner:
AUTOZONE, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL MIGIS, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Migis
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Erick Moran v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01964
Plaintiff:
Erick Moran
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Autozone, Inc. v. Michael Migi
as 09-80031
Petitioner:
AUTOZONE, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL MIGIS, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
