Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 151 - 160 of 637
State of California et al v. Trump et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00872
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Steven T. Mnuchin, United States of America and others
Petitioner: Southern Border Communities Coalition and Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Sierra Club et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01494
Defendant: Mark T. Esper, Donald J. Trump and Chad F. Wolf
Plaintiff: Southern Border Communities Coalition and Sierra Club
Amicus Curiae: U.S. House of Representatives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Native Village of Nuiqsut, et al v. BLM, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35224
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, CHAD PADGETT, in his official capacity as Alaska State Director of the Bureau of Land Management, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, NATIVE VILLAGE OF NUIQSUT and others
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Save Our County et al v. United States Defense Logistics Agency et al
as 4:2020cv01267
Plaintiff: Save Our County, Sierra Club, Community In-Power and Development Association Inc. and others
Defendant: United States Defense Logistics Agency, Mark T. Esper, Darrell K. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sierra Club v. Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00152
Intervenor: The Doe Run Resources Corporation and American Forest & Paper Association
Not Yet Classified: Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc. and Doe Run Resources Corporation, The doing business as Doe Run Company, The
Plaintiff: Sierra Club
Defendant: Lisa P. Jackson and Gina McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17501
Defendant / Appellant: STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
Kehano v. Harrington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00071
Respondent: David Y. Ige, Department of Land and Natural Resources, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration and others
Petitioner: Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Interested Party: Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra Club v. U.S. Department of Interior et al
as 3:2019cv08288
Defendant: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and U.S. Department of Interior
Plaintiff: Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ctr. for Biological Diversity, et al v. USFWS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17585
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SONNY PERDUE, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, HOPI TRIBE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: ROSEMONT COPPER COMPANY
Ctr, for Biological Diversity, et al v. Rosemont Copper Co., et al
as 19-17586
Defendant: VICKI CHRISTIANSEN, Interim Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, CALVIN JOYNER, Regional Forester, SONNY PERDUE, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, HOPI TRIBE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: ROSEMONT COPPER COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?