Cases 11 - 20 of 2,076
Ada W. Hoo v. Luis E. Salgado et al
as 8:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Ada W. Hoo
Defendant:
Luis E. Salgado, Maria L. Gomez and Melanie Castro
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKesson Corp. v. TIN Rx The Independent Network, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01225
Plaintiff:
McKesson Corporation
Defendant:
TIN Rx The Independent Network, Inc., TIN Rx / Castro San Francisco and Tin Rx At The Tower, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Castro
as 24-2702
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ISRAEL CASTRO, JR.
(PC) Thomas v. Castro et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
J. Castro and Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Castro, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2678
Petitioner:
MAIRA ELIZABET MARTINEZ-CASTRO and JESUS ELIEL MARTINEZ-CASTRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castro v. Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Arnold Samuel Castro
Defendant:
Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Castro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Lorena Castro
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Sun Life Family Health Center Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant:
Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Castro v. ABM General Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Luis Castro
Defendant:
ABM General Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
