Cases 11 - 20 of 2,039
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzalez v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-2371
Petitioner:
LEON ABEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JUAN HERRERA, Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Manager for Long Beach, in his official capacity and COLLETTE PETERS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in her official capacity
Felix Herrera v. Garland
as 24-2298
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL FELIX HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bucio Herrera v. Garland
as 24-2330
Petitioner:
GERARDO BUCIO HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Servin, S. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Herrera v. Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX S.S.A. et al
as 2:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guy Herrera
Defendant:
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX S.S.A. and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Herrera-De Ganuza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1624
Petitioner:
ANA RUTH HERRERA-DE GANUZA and JUSTIN YANCARLOS SORIANO-HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff
as 2:2024cv02241
Petitioner:
Roberto Herrera
Respondent:
CDCR Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
