Cases 11 - 20 of 567
Fly v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dane Fly
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, NDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Brian K Wilson
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp v. Jeff Lynch et al.
as 2:2023cv08317
Petitioner:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzalez-Mendez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1731
Petitioner:
NORMA ADALI GONZALEZ-MENDEZ and KARLA FERNANDA ARANA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miller v. Keast et al
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Micheal Miller
Defendant:
John Keast, Halki, Jessica Rambur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Lynch et al.
as 3:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carlos Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON and others
(PC) Berumen v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Daniel Berumen
Defendant:
T. Jones, L. Carrasco, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalpesh Solanki v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Defendant:
Officer Arana, Officer Bonilla, Officer T. Cho and others
Plaintiff:
Kalpesh Solanki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert LeClair v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT LECLAIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS and HAROLD WICKHAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
