Cases 11 - 20 of 712
Coney v. LVMPD Michael Lozo et al
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
William Coney
Defendant:
LVMPD Michael Lozo, A. Mariscal, PO J. Brandon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ball v. Citibank
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
William H Ball
Defendant:
Citibank a New York Corporation doing business as Sears Shop Your Way
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
EVIG, LLC v. New Relief, LLC dba Vitamax et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
EVIG, LLC
Defendant:
New Relief, LLC dba Vitamax, David H Schindler, Matthew J Schindler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jeewa v. Newcomer et al
as 2:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Mo Jeewa
Defendant:
Mark R. Newcomer, Mark Attinger, Daniel H. Spence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
