Cases 11 - 20 of 10,684
Gallagher v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Timothy Gallagher
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Galvez v. O'Malley
as 24-3569
Plaintiff:
LYDIA GALVEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Gonzales v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Echo Regina Gonzales
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Morales v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03396
Plaintiff:
Randy Morales
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Flores v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Flores
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pierce v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv04699
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Pierce
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Medina v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Eliath Xiomar Medina
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gando v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Fatin Sawa Gando
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Neifert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas Neifert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Commet v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Mark Commet
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
