Cases 11 - 20 of 2,971
Ramirez v. Val
as 3:2024cv03190
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Val
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grupo Fifty Eight LLC v. Mercedes Ramirez et al
as 2:2024cv04343
Plaintiff:
Grupo Fifty Eight LLC
Defendant:
Mercedes Ramirez, Steven Martinez, Marizza Garcia and others
Steven Completo et al v. Richman Property Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04233
Plaintiff:
Steven Completo, Adriana Guillen, Guozhi Cheng and others
Defendant:
Richman Property Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ramirez v. James
as 3:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Tommasi et al
as 3:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Theresa Tommasi, Val and Travis Michael Kelce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Tommasi et al
as 3:2024cv02970
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Theresa Tommasi, Val and Travis Michael Kelce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Val et al
as 4:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Val, Theresa Tommasi and Travis Micheal Kelce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
