Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Casterlow-Bey et al v. National Park Service et al
as 3:2017cv05711
Plaintiff:
Gary Casterlow-Bey and Anthony Clark
Defendant:
National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior and National Register for Historic Places
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00145
Defendant:
Sheriff Allen, Washoe County Detention Facility and Washoe County Detention Facility Medical
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Clark v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv04034
Petitioner:
Anthony Clark
In Re:
In Re Seizure of 2014 Ford Explorer and 2015 Audi
Respondent:
United States of America
Robert Clark v. The Director of Corrections, et al
as 12-17515
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
THE DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS and RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Lascelles Linton v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73252
Petitioner:
LASCELLES LINTON, AKA Anthony Clark, AKA John Doe, AKA Liascelle Malciolm, AKA Roy Moore
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Clarke v. Cate
as 3:2012cv02490
Petitioner:
Anthony Clarke
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarke v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clarke
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, S. Kernan, A. Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Clarke v. Matthew Cate
as 12-55113
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY CLARKE
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of California Department of Corrections
Robert Anthony Clark v. The Director of Correction et al
as 4:2011cv06303
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Clark
Respondent:
Director of Correction and Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Anthony Clark v. The Director of Correction et al
as 2:2011cv09481
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Clark
Respondent:
Director of Correction and Randy Grounds
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
