Cases 11 - 20 of 307
Mitchell v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2023cv06295
Plaintiff:
Correy Mitchell
Defendant:
Ronald Broomfield and Elisha Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2023cv06528
Plaintiff:
Duane Johnson
Defendant:
State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Broomfield
as 5:2023cv06017
Petitioner:
Gabriel Elena Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Case v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv05757
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Case
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, et al. v. Allison, et al.
as 23-4271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON, LAMAVIS A. COMUNDOIWILLA and ROY L. BROWN
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, RALPH DIAZ and others
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendoza v. Broomfield
as 23-3766
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL MENDOZA
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Jenkins v. Broomfield
as 23-3612
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL STEVEN JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Poye-Perez v. Diaz et al
as 3:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Serguey Poye-Perez
Defendant:
R Diaz, K Allison, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Ayers et al
as 4:2023cv05169
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derric Lancaster
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
