Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Douglas Kisaka v. USC, et al
as 14-55649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS KISAKA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, J. YOUNG, individual and ID No 56826 Public Safety Officer of USC, C. JIMENEZ, individual and ID No 472570 Public Safety Officer of USC and others
Douglas Kisaka v. USC, et al
as 13-57135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS KISAKA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, J. YOUNG, individual and ID No 56826 Public Safety Officer of USC, C. JIMENEZ, individual and ID No 472570 Public Safety Officer of USC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas Kisaka v. USC, et al
as 12-57283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS KISAKA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, C. JIMENEZ, individual and ID No 472570 Public Safety Officer of USC, J. YOUNG, individual and ID No 56826 Public Safety Officer of USC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jimenez v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2011cv00237
Petitioner:
Federico C. Jimenez
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doug Kisaka et al v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2011cv01942
Defendant:
Does, Carey Drayton, Carey Drayton and others
Plaintiff:
Doug Kisaka
Francisco L. Jimenez et al v. GMAC Mortgage et al
as 2:2011cv00601
Defendant:
ETS Service LLC and GMAC Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Francisco L. Jimenez and Nieves C. Jimenez
John Doe v. University of Southern USC California et al
as 2:2010cv09827
Defendant:
Does, Carey Drayton, Carey Drayton and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Jimenez v. Horel
as 2:2010cv02943
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Jimenez
Defendant:
J. Whitfield, R. L. Bond, Melgoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
