Cases 11 - 20 of 27
RAC Development Inc. v. Carlos Chavez et al
as 5:2019cv00891
Defendant:
Carlos Chavez and DOES 1 thru 10
Plaintiff:
RAC Development Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Helen Langley et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv05490
Defendant:
Sargeant Sandoz, Officer Reyes, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith, Irvin Anderson, Helen Langley and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Carlos Chavez-Velez
as 16-10337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS ABEL CHAVEZ-VELEZ, AKA Carlos Chavez-Velez, AKA Marco Antonio Salas-Rubio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jose Bernal v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01448
Defendant:
4 MP, Inc., AA Investments, ATM Trucking and others
Plaintiff:
German Aguila, Francisco Aguilar, Anibal Aldara and others
SIPP International Industries, Inc. v. Pearson et al
as 2:2014cv00054
Defendant:
Carlos Chavez, Gregg Pearson and Mark Suchy
Interested Party:
H.T. Langrill
Plaintiff:
SIPP International Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Edd Christopher Rogers v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv06506
Defendant:
Bernal, California Dept of Adult Parole Operations, California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Plaintiff:
Edd Christopher Rogers
Carlos Chavez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70291
Petitioner:
CARLOS CHAVEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. United Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07116
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Chavez Alcaraz, Does, R.L. Jones-San Diego, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
USA v. Wilsonis Ayala-Villanueva
as 10-15061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILSONIS AYALA-VILLANUEVA, AKA Juan Carlos Chavez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
