Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Holmes v. Roberts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01883
Petitioner: Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent: Sarah M. Roberts and Dan Satterberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joel Holmes v. Sarah Roberts, et al
as 17-73119
Petitioner: JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent: SARAH ROBERTS and ROB MCKENNA
Holmes v. Satterberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01705
Petitioner: Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent: Sarah Marion Roberts and Daniel Satterberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Miller-Stout et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05145
Plaintiff: Joel Christopher Holmes
Defendant: Maggie Miller-Stout, M Douglas, Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Holmes v. Ana Cause
as 16-35658
Petitioner - Appellant: JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee: ANA MARI CAUSE
Joel Holmes v. Sarah Roberts, et al
as 16-35656
Petitioner - Appellant: JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee: SARAH ROBERTS, Shoreline City Prosecutor and ROB MCKENNA, Attorney General of the State of Washington
Joel Holmes v. Daniel Satterberg, et al
as 16-35654
Petitioner - Appellant: JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee: DANIEL SATTERBERG, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and ROBERT FERGUSON, Attorney General of the State of Washington
Holmes v. Cause
as 2:2016cv00784
Petitioner: Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent: Ana Mari Cause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Roberts et al
as 2:2016cv00747
Petitioner: Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent: Sarah Marion Roberts and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2016cv00746
Petitioner: Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent: Daniel T Satterberg and Robert Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?