Cases 11 - 20 of 1,354
Toney A. Johnson v. Costa
as 2:2024cv06091
Defendant:
CO Costa
Plaintiff:
Toney Alfonso Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Costa v. The Procter and Gamble Company
as 3:2024cv04390
Defendant:
The Procter and Gamble Company
Plaintiff:
Nicole Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
United States of America -v- Peretti et al
as 3:2024cv04318
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Contra Costa County Treasurer, Mark J Peretti and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gomes da Costa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4297
Petitioner:
RODRIGO GOMES DA COSTA, CAROLINA ROBERTA LEMES MACHADO COSTA and MATHEUS LEMES DA COSTA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Woolard, et al. v. Thurmond, et al.
as 24-4291
Defendant:
BRIAN ALBRIGHT, BARRY LINDAMAN, TONY THURMOND and others
Plaintiff:
BREANNA WOOLARD, JOHN WOOLARD, DIANA GONZALES and others
Allen v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2024cv03759
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa and John Krieg
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2024cv03565
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Velarde, Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Sarah Bluestone and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Latrice Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Contra Costa Superior Court
as 4:2024cv03562
Defendant:
Contra Costa Superior Court
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01276
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
