Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Bonilla v. County of Napa
as 4:2022cv04904
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinsukthaworn et al v. City of Calistoga et al
as 3:2022cv04644
Plaintiff:
Kochagorn Sinsukthaworn and James Hopkins
Defendant:
City of Calistoga, City of St. Helena, County of Napa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hogan et al v. Napa County District Attorney et al
as 3:2022cv04052
Plaintiff:
Tambra Hogan and Keith Rivers
Defendant:
Napa County District Attorney, County of Napa, Jennifer Allison Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
People of the State of California et al v. Munson
as 3:2021cv09155
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, Superior Court of California, County of Napa and others
Defendant:
Tyler Wayne Munson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis et al v. County of Napa
as 3:2021cv04603
Plaintiff:
Katina Davis and Jae Steward
Defendant:
County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis et al v. County of Napa
as 2:2021at00540
Plaintiff:
Katina Davis and Jae Steward
Defendant:
County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Garcia et al v County of Napa et al
as 4:2021cv03519
Plaintiff:
E. G., a Minor, Jose Garcia Flores, Juan Garcia and others
Defendant:
David Ackman and County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
