Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Robben v. Carson City, et al
as 3:2015cv00530
Defendant:
Carson City, City of, Department of Alternative Sentencing, Tad Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Robben
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kakowski v. Furlong et al
as 3:2015cv00345
Defendant:
Furlong and Kenninson
Plaintiff:
Brian Kakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOUTHPORT LANE EQUITY II, LLC et al v. DOWNEY et al
as 3:2015cv00335
Defendant:
DOMINIC DE LORENZO, RON DOWNEY, ALEX DROSIN and others
Nominal Defendant:
MASSIVE INTERACTIVE, INC.
Plaintiff:
MASSIVE INTERACTIVE, INC. and SOUTHPORT LANE EQUITY II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Kakowski v. Furlong et al
as 3:2014cv00301
Defendant:
Furlong, Sean Palamar and Josh Stagliano
Plaintiff:
Brian Kakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Furlong et al
as 3:2013cv00490
Defendant:
Ken Furlong, Mays and White
Plaintiff:
Derek Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Foster v. Furlong et al
as 3:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
John M. Foster
Defendant:
Ken Furlong and Cecilia Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmitt v. Furlong et al
as 3:2011cv00602
Defendant:
Carson City and Ken Furlong
Plaintiff:
Robert Frank Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyzbir v. Furlong et al
as 3:2011cv00320
Defendant:
Steve Albertson, Jack Freer, Ken Furlong and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Tyzbir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Big Pond v. Furlong et al
as 3:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Big Pond
Defendant:
Jason Bueno, Carson, County of, City of, Carson City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Big Pond v. Furlong et al
as 3:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Big Pond
Defendant:
Ken Furlong and Neil A. Rombardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
