Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Francisco Garcia v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-56335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, individual capacity, ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff Los Angeles County, in individual capacity, ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff Los Angeles County, in official capacity and others
Rickaby et al v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02190
Plaintiff:
Dylan Rickaby, John Michael Koeller, Francisco Garcia and others
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francisco Garcia v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2020cv08528
Defendant:
Nurse Perez, John Does, Tilton and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Garcia-Ruiz v. William Barr
as 20-72831
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GARCIA-RUIZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Bey v. Garcia
as 1:2020cv00795
Defendant:
Francisco Garcia
Plaintiff:
Kaba Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. C. Zeller, et al
as 2:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Garcia and Panchito
Defendant:
M. Ware, White, C. Zeller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Garcia-Lopez v. William Barr
as 20-70571
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GARCIA-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Francisco Garcia De Jesus
as 19-10417
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO GARCIA DE JESUS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romulo Flores v. William Barr
as 19-72559
Petitioner:
ROMULO FLORES, AKA X. Cesar, AKA Pomulo Flores, AKA Romulfo Hidalgo Flores, AKA Romulo Flores-Hidalgo, AKA Romulo Floreshidalgo, AKA Cesar Florez, AKA Cesar Marcos Florez, AKA Marcos Florez, AKA Francisco Garcia, AKA Romulfo F. Hidalgo, AKA Romulfo F
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Marvin Francisco Garcia-Cruz v. William Barr
as 19-71363
Petitioner:
MARVIN FRANCISCO GARCIA-CRUZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
