Cases 11 - 20 of 796
(PC) Jackson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Rivera, Schmalls, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sundby, et al. v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc., et al.
as 24-1027
Plaintiff:
DALE SUNDBY and EDITH SUNDBY
Defendant:
MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, INC., PLATINUM LOAN SERVICING, INC., JEFFREY MYERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024mc80045
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Gregory J. Ahern, Alameda County Santa Rita Jail and others
Sundby v. Myers, et al.
as 24-865
Plaintiff:
DALE SUNDBY
Defendant:
JEFFREY MYERS, KATHLEEN MYERS, ANDRES SALSIDO, Trustee and others
Other:
EDITH SUNDBY, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hernndez v. Rajjot Sweet & Snacks, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Hernndez
Defendant:
Rajjot Sweet & Snacks, Inc., Tek Gill, Balbinder Kaur and others
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Murray v. Gade
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Murray
Defendant:
Gilles Gade doing business as Cross River Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
