Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Nathan Rubin v. Brian Mariotti et al
as 2:2020cv10083
Defendant:
Funko, Inc, Michael Lunsford, Brian Mariotti and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rubin and Richard Fletcher
Amber Evans v. Brian Mariotti et al
as 2:2020cv05001
Defendant:
Michael Lunsford, Brian Mariotti, Adam Kriger and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Evans
Franco Cassella et al v.Brian Mariotti et al
as 2:2020cv03740
Plaintiff:
Franco Cassella, Dean Marconi and Jacoby Plummer
Defendant:
Adam Kriger, Diane Irvine, Michael Lunsford and others
Rhodes v. Ford et al
as 4:2020cv03128
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, D. Lunsford, B. Buckhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Kavin Maurice Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christine Lunsford v. The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00012
Defendant:
The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC, Does, Natural Alternatives International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Natural Pack, Inc. et al v. Syndicate Sales, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv08867
Defendant:
Syndicate Sales, Inc., Thomas C. Lunsford, Laura D. Shinall and others
Plaintiff:
Natural Pack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gary Lunsford v. Green Auto Parts and Recycling, Inc.
as 2:2019cv07639
Defendant:
Green Auto Parts & Recycling, Inc. d/b/a Bells Auto Parts Wrecking, Green Auto Parts and Recycling, Inc. and Green Auto Parts and Recycling, Inc. doing business as Bells Auto Parts Wrecking
Plaintiff:
Gary Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Xavier D. Nailing v. Jackie Lacey et al
as 2:2018cv04327
Defendant:
Evelis M. DeGarmo, Evelis M. DeGarmo, Jackie Lacey and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier D. Nailing
Lunsford v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00805
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Lunsford
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUNSFORD v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017at00465
Plaintiff:
GARY A. LUNSFORD
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
