Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Solis #153261 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02378
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lozano Solis
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Acosta, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozano v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2016cv02348
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lozano
Defendant:
Bank of America NA and Experian Information Solutions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lozano v. National Credit Systems Incorporated
as 2:2016cv01873
Plaintiff:
Daesy Lozano
Defendant:
National Credit Systems Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lozano v. Giovino et al
as 2:2015cv01859
Plaintiff:
David Lozano
Defendant:
James Giovino , Edwin Burnett and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lozano v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02548
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Lozano
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Unknown Schroeder, Unknown Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assyd et al v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02460
Plaintiff:
Joe M Assyd, William Batchelder, Tasunka Wright and others
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Unknown Schroeder, Unknown Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozano v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
as 4:2013cv02450
Plaintiff:
Genesia E Lozano
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez-Lozano v. Merlak
as 2:2013cv01006
Petitioner:
Alberto Angel Gonzalez-Lozano
Respondent:
Steve Merlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
De La Trinidad-Lozano v. USA
as 2:2013cv00766
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gilberto De La Trinidad-Lozano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lozano v. Wilmington Trust Company et al
as 2:2012cv01210
Plaintiff:
Ernie Lozano, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilmington Trust Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
