Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Bryant v. Waller et al
as 2:2016cv01661
Plaintiff:
Gerald C Bryant
Defendant:
Van Waller, Ron Burris, Andre Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Thomas v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jayaton-Kerry Edward Thomas
Defendant:
USA, CEO of USA, Dale A. Drozd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hildebrand v. F. Chavez, et al
as 12-17685
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCOY HILDEBRAND
Respondent - Appellee:
F. X. CHAVEZ and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Albayanira Carcamo v. Superior Court of California, et al
as 12-56312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBAYANIRA CARCAMO
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and J. MICHAEL MCCOY
Albayanira Carcamo v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside et al
as 5:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Albayanira Carcamo
Defendant:
J Michael McCoy and Superior Court of California County of Riverside
Alba Yanira Carcamo v. J Michael McCoy
as 2:2012cv03809
Plaintiff:
Alba Yanira Carcamo
Defendant:
J Michael McCoy
Jesse Dupris, et al v. Selanhongva McDonald, et al
as 12-15243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE DUPRIS, a married man and JEREMY REED, a married man
Defendant - Appellee:
SELANHONGVA MCDONALD, in his individual capacity as special agent in charge with the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, PERRY PROCTOR, TINO LOPEZ and others
DeGrazio v. Sonora Union High School District et al
as 1:2011cv01294
Plaintiff:
John DeGrazio
Defendant:
Sonora Union High School District , Michael McCoy and David Rowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hildebrand v. Chavez et al
as 4:2010cv01957
Plaintiff:
Michael McCoy Hildebrand
Defendant:
F.X. Chavez and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael McCoy v. USDCBOI
as 10-71414
:
In re: MICHAEL MCCOY
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCCOY
Respondent:
USDC, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
JOANNA SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
